Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soledad Aquino
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 02:14, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Soledad Aquino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article's subject is not notable enough VRtrooper (talk) 06:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Weak Delete Impossible to find any sources, especially since the name is shared by so many. All of the movies are articless as well, which never bodes well. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep had lead in 4 films, 2nd or 3rd billing in 3 others. There are less Phillipine film articles than many other countries.Atlantic306 (talk) 21:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- It is impossible to find any relible sources to strenghten her article's notability. Supergabbyshoe (talk2me) 09:25, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show they pass WP:GNG, and simply doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 16:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.